This way to Brazen World

Posts Tagged ‘facebook’

New Facebook Premium Ads – the beginning of truly social advertising

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

So, pre-IPO, the question arises, just how are Facebook are going to earn their money and sustain their growth?

The indication below suggests that a much more social, but importantly ACTION-led suite of Facebook ads are now due to roll out. Ads which, at their heart are largely driven by the actions and inteactions of fans with your content. In this regard, this is nothing new, but the interesting considerations will be three-fold:

1) Interaction/engagement rates will climb, as will the costs – ads with social references have always out-performed standard ads (wonder of this is why Facebook dropped their average CPC rates recently). It’s easy to see how Facebook will earn more from the new version of the old!

2) How this will affect edgerank – the largely unknown aspect of edgerank has been the weighting criteria. What priority is Facebook giving to different media? The suggestion here is that  Facebook are expecting ads (and therefore your content) to become much more interactive, multimedia-focussed. Your content plan (if it isn’t already) needs to reflect this.

3) Will Facebook soon start generating social ad content off your frictionless shared content? If it is already including you in ads based on your in-page gestures such as likes, comments and shares, it is more then feasible that we will see frictionlessly-shared content appearing in ads before long. The article you read, the track you listened to, might soon all become targetable in ad campaigns!

Exciting times, come what may!
Facebook Premium Ads Overview

Insights 12 – what needs to be on your digital agenda in 2012? Six of 10 – Social Commerce

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Social commerce has been on the rise for well over 12 months, and was actually a topic for my presentation at last year’s Insight’s conference. At that time, it was fair to say that the web was awash, with Facebook shops becoming commonplace. With it came the debate about whether or not Facebook users were ready yet or even at all comfortable with their favourite Pages becoming direct sales channels.

The ASOS experiment which made up so many of the headlines has gone quiet and ASOS have (not surprisingly) kept the results of their shop close to their chests – but are Facebook shops ALL social commerce has to offer?

As we have already seen in other videos, the increasing integration of our Facebook data – “the opening of the social graph” into applications, mobiles, the websites we use, as well as now ubiquitous checkins means that at every turn, we are AUTOMATICALLY able to see what our friends are doing, where they are, what they have watched, what they have bought or quite simply, what track they have just listened to.

i.e. things that WE may also want to do or buy.

Now whilst this is nothing new to anyone involved in word of mouth marketing, the big difference is that all of these actions, pre-2012 required a conscious decisions to post to our networks. As such, many of the actions which may have influenced a friend to rent the same film, buy the track their friend is listening to, or be the first to buy the dress that 2 of their friends were looking at on Site X were missing.

2012 will be a much larger and commercially-focussed one for the understanding of what social commerce actually is – the influencing of purchasing decisions through the integration of social data (profile and friends).

Insight 12: What’s on your digital agenda in 2012? Three of 10 – Dynamic Personalisation

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

As marketers and communicators, we’ve long known that the more we know about people, the better our chances of success. The right message delivered at the right time to the right person stands a much greater chance of generating a reaction than something irrelevant. To coin a more recent social medial cliche, we are talking about context.

As media become increasingly digital and therefore accountable, there are plethora of ways to understand and identify patterns of habits through activity (and a lack of activity) around certain contant. However, in this increasingly social world, these are number, faceless statistics. At Brazen, we call these HARD metrics, things which are simply numerical in value which contain little indication of sentiment or emotion.

In walks Facebook and its social graph.

The social graph (upon which Facebook’s Advertising Platform is built) presents the significant human angle to analytics – the missing piece so to speak.

That we can now select and understand people’s personal and lifestyle preferences means that we can have a previously untold picture of WHO not WHAT the person is.

The Open Graph

Now that the Social Graph has become the Open Graph (i.e. 3rd party services can now connect to your Facebook profile data), we are entering an area where the web experience can be a totally customised one – and one which you may well not even realise is personalised until you see someone else’s version of the same site.

I expect to see a huge increase in 2012 in the number of sites personalising your website experience as a result of being able to access your social graph, introducing content and products that are more relevant than ever before.

The right product to the right person at the right time.

The Trust Issue

Facebook has to continually battle trust issues for good reason. Without the trust of its users (i.e. the respectful handling of sensitive, personal information), they lose the virtual tons of lifestyle information customers pour into it and Facebook loses a revolutionary way to provide insight for advertisers.

In some way, one might argue that in collating all this social data, Facebook’s more sinister data gathering role is actually helping to bring about a better experience for web users. But this will only work as long as trust prevails.

For 2012, get your head around how you could personalise your customer’s web experience just by looking at what information YOU give to your Facebook profile. It could be the most creative thing you could do today!

THE HISTORY OF SOCIAL MEDIA GAFFES HAS A NEW ANTI-HERO – NESTLE & FACEBOOK

Friday, March 19th, 2010

nestle

In ten years time, when we have a tangible appreciation of what social media really is, this day will go down in history as Nestle Day.

The multi-national confectionery company has been taught a lesson today, one that may not prove to be so sweet for its social media monitor once the board discovers exactly the kind of dialogue he or she has been having with ‘fans’ of the firm’s Facebook page.

Here’s how to go from ‘engaging conversation with consumers’ to worldwide scorn in five sentences, the Nestle way.

Nestle’s Facebook page started today with this simple, but inherently idiotic, status update.

“To repeat: we welcome your comments, but please don’t post using an altered version of any of our logos as your profile pic – they will be deleted.”

And the Chinese Whisper of social media commentary immediately turned into a howl of derision that echoed, rapidly, around the world.

The first to comment was Nestle friend Paul Griffin. He offered a little timely and gentle advice to the Nestle executive pushing the company’s Facebook buttons.

“Social Media is about embracing your market, engaging and having a conversation rather than preaching.”

So what would you do next?

Well, you’d probably not say what the, by now clearly irritated, Nestle pen-pusher said:

“Thanks for the lesson in manners. Consider yourself embraced. But it’s our page, we set the rules, it was ever thus.”

All of a sudden the world began to pay attention, but not for the reasons Nestle would have liked I’m guessing.

But not to be outdone the company’s Facebook clerk had clearly smelled blood and wanted to set out his, and by default, Nestle’s position with a little more clarity.

“You have freedom of speech and expression. Here, there are some rules we set. As in almost any other forum. It’s to keep things clear.”

It’s not exactly the spirit of engagement anyone with even the most casual of social media knowledge-bases would recognise or recommend is it?

The monumental social media gaffe is now being PDF’d around the globe and discussed on forums covering everything from videogames to politics as well as every established social media site on the web.

We won’t truly know the value of this PR disaster for many months but, right now, in the bright sunlight of this Friday morning the words ‘paddle’ and ‘shit-creek’ come readily to mind.

By Adam Moss, Brazen News Editor

HOW SOCIABLE IS SOCIAL MEDIA?

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Victoria is… starting to think in Facebook statuses.

Seriously, I actually have a ‘status dialogue’ going in my head as I walk to Brazen every morning.

Diagnosis? Socialmediaitis.

Yes, the personality disorder of the noughties and teenies. A disease that prevents the afflicted from putting down their iPhone, BlackBerry or Nexus Social for a second for fear of missing some crucial tweet or status update.

Social media sites have been around for years and continue to grow at an astonishing rate. This means ta-ra tangible RSVPs. RIP Dear John letters. Now we click ‘Not attending’ on Facebook and change our ‘relationship status’ to single if we’re fed up of our current beau (or belle). They’ll soon get the message. And if they don’t, a gentle de-friend will do the trick.

No wonder we are addicted. Social media is a marvelous mask to hide us from awkward social situations.

Of course it is much more than that too – an amazing platform for sharing information, a great way to communicate and, importantly to me, a great PR tool. It pushes us to break down our creative barriers and provides us with new channels to reach target audiences.

But, our beloved digital natives should beware: talking will never go out of fashion and is great for relationship building. And you never know, you might need it for a job interview one day, providing the twinterview doesn’t progress that far. And maybe you’ll get married, that’s more than clicking ‘married’ on Facebook… it’s an actual thing.

Victoria is… wondering how to cut my blog down to 140 characters so I can tweet it. #theend

By Victoria Barker, Senior Account Director

MICRO-NOT-SO-SOFT HAS DECLARED WAR

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Move aside Pepsi VS Coco cola, Cadbury VS Nestle..step into the ring – Bing..VS..er.. Google?

Microsoft’s latest offering, the recently launched Bing search engine, is setting out to steal a share of Google’s market.

They reckon that they can bring a new approach to Internet search by providing a richer, easier, and more organised search experience. This, for example, means that Bing will integrate data from consumer reviews when a search brings up a restaurant..you know, sort the KFCs from the Texas Fried Chicken shops.

Also, you can ditch the reams of rubbish..say you search a term such as “Facebook” it just returns one result – Facebook.com, which I think is pretty helpful.

The big question is though – will we ever really be ‘binging it’? When we need a quick answer will we not quickly Google it? Personally, I can’t see this happening. But, it’s got me thinking…

Thinking about just how much web addresses have actually integrated into our vocab. And I don’t mean when we are deep in digital conversation – just everyday. The amount of people who rush to the bus stop and splutter: ‘Bloody hell, that was a bit lastminute.com’ or glance perplexed across a room muttering:’confused.com’. And then there’s the really weird people who just add a ‘dot com’ to anything – ‘I’m really tired.com’ – bizarre.

I mean, there’s always been the brand names that have slipped into our language – Housewife: “I’m going to do a spot of hoovering, I would wear my marigolds but they are sellotaped together.” But now it’s all gone digital. Perhaps this really is the new way to measure website success and domination?

Maybe next time I’m doing a little research into the latest media phenomenon or consumer PR strategy for Brazen, I’ll be ‘Binging it’.

By Katie Medd, Account Executive

THE REVOLVING REVOLUTION

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Can you believe it, online networking is supposedly more popular than email!

It seems slowly but surely, the Facebook phenomenon is completely revolutionising the way we communicate. Even yesterday I wrote ‘status update – would anyone like a coffee?’ on an A4 piece of paper whilst walking around the Brazen office with it held above my head.

So…aren’t we a really clever generation for designing this revolutionary communication format!? Well…not really.

Delving deeper into a social network’s fundamental basics, lets take the world’s most popular networking site Facebook as an example, is it revolutionary or are we all riding the reinvented wheel?

The Facebook profile – an online ego extension providing a first hand insight into one’s own personal lifestyle. How about we call this a website dedicated to me?

Facebook messaging – a communication technique where users are able to compose and send messages in the form of…an electronic…envelope…mail thingy. Hang on a minute, did I just hear that online networking is now more popular than email?

Facebook wall posts – the same principle as the revolutionary Facebook messaging but without the privacy of course.

Facebook chat – a real time communication application that allows two-way communication between contacts. Also known as MSN Messenger which was first established when I was a small boy.

Facebook video…Youtube!

Facebook photo albums…go see my mum, she’s got hundreds of photos complete with handwritten tags highlighting when and where the photo was taken and who is pictured.

The list goes on and on. So is there anything revolutionary about Facebook or social networks?

Well maybe, status updates appear to be an ever-growing trend. We all do it, log into Facebook and immediately scroll through all of our friend’s updates and I don’t know anyone who isn’t fascinated by Stephen Fry on Twitter. So how can I discredit the status update?

Well I can’t to be honest. This could actually be a revolutionary trend of electronic communication. In principle, we’re conducting two-way communication via a one-dimensional channel, answering the questions ‘how are you?’ and ‘what have you been up to?’ before we’re even asked the question. For the time being, it seems Facebook is our answer to telepathy.

By Graeme Anthony, Account Manager

TWITTER ANNOUNCES CORPORATE CHARGES

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

Twitter today unveiled its plans to start charging corporates for sending tweets to its followers. The move has been on the cards for a little while now and Biz Stone, co-founder of Twitter explained:

“We think there will be opportunities to provide services to commercial entities that help them get even more value out of Twitter. If these services are valuable to companies, we think they may want to pay for them,”

With the massive upsurge in popularity of Twitter in recent weeks, (1,382% increase YOY in February according to Nielsen Online, although exact figures of users vary with little official information out there – possibly 5m, worldwide?) it’s no wonder Twitter wants to cash in as there’s potentially a large fortune to be made.

Actually the truth may be even simpler. Having recently refinanced there will undoubtedly be a pressing need to show a significant return to investors.

However, there are some pressing questions that need to be answered before the new charge can be judged to be a success or not;
How will the Twitter community respond?
Will there be a backlash?
Will brands and marketers be prepared to pay?
How will the cost of acquisition and cost of sale compare to other channels?
Will it devalue the overall user experience having sponsored areas?

Will Twitter be successful in its latest move or will it backtrack like Facebook ? What do you think?

twitter1

By Rick Guttridge, Associate Group Director